This project studies global mobility and
territories in dispersion. By “territories in dispersion” I refer to social
habitats that are no longer physically contained in geographically continuous
areas, but have been spread out and re-articulated by artificial means.
The
de-territorialized condition created by increased mobility — particularly by
migration — had led to an urbanism of artificial re-territorialization. This is a fictional urbanism — as
based on mental but tangible constructions — that is manifested in the city as fragments,
micro-environments of global circuits, each of which establishes its own
identity, time, rules, and aesthetics — its own atmospheres. These fragments
are globally connected and articulated by abstract infrastructures like
telecommunications systems, as much as by physical places — ethnic shops,
religious centres, etc. — and by the imaginary and idealized realms through
which dispersed societies operate. This is an urbanism ruled by traditional
values, by intuitive and emotional forces, as much as by efficiency
This project argues that as patterns of dispersion
intensify, they generate not just fragmented societies, but a new territorial
cohesion — a realm in which the “the
collective” has gained a new dimension. Cultural identity is no longer
necessarily linked to geographical place, or to traditional territorial
structures like the nation-state, but has become a particular concept attached
to individual imaginations though subjected to and conditioned by the
contradictory pressures of self-determination and commoditization.
This
project is an attempt to trace the patterns of urban dispersals shaped by
migration to the city of Rotterdam — a city whose harbour has made it one of
the most concentrated points of settlement for Cape Verdean emigrants. As rates
of resettlement increase, simultaneous with technological advances in recent
years, cities like Rotterdam
operate through direct relationships between the global and the personal;
between world-scale social and economic networks and customized communication
devices like the cellular phone.
Despite the increase of migration from non-western
societies, its urban consequences in the western world are still largely
regarded as anomalies, or at best “transitory conditions” within the
established models of development, and are often mentioned within a discourse
on “integration,” which usually implies a brutal absorption into the dominant
society. Because the urban conditions shaped by migration processes are not yet
fully understood, we are not in a position to reap their urban planning
potential. But an analysis of these phenomena from a different perspective
reveals that they are not marginal aberrations, but sophisticated urban models
in times of increased mobility and globalization